<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Channel Marker</title>
	<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com</link>
	<description>A SearchITChannel.com blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.0</generator>
	<language>en</language>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>cferraro@techtarget.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>cferraro@techtarget.com()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>A SearchITChannel.com blog</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>cferraro@techtarget.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not a Microsoft thing stupid, it&#8217;s about Juniper!</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/its-not-a-microsoft-stupid-its-about-juniper/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/its-not-a-microsoft-stupid-its-about-juniper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rlittle</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Microsoft</category>

		<category>Networking technology</category>

		<category>Cisco</category>

		<category>News</category>

		<category>Authors</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/its-not-a-microsoft-stupid-its-about-juniper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Juniper running scared? Moving in new directions? Something&#8217;s up. CEO Scott Kriens &#8212; who has been with the company since its inception in 1996 &#8212; is out, and folks on the street say they didn’t see this one coming. Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft’s Platform &#38; Services division is in, and Microsoft folks also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Juniper running scared? Moving in new directions? Something&#8217;s up. CEO Scott Kriens &#8212; who has been with the company since its inception in 1996 &#8212; is out, and folks on the street say they didn’t see this one coming. Kevin Johnson, president of Microsoft’s Platform &amp; Services division is in, and Microsoft folks also say they had no clue.</p>
<p>Kriens will remain at Juniper as chairman of the board working with “leadership and strategy” &#8212; you know, now that he’s no longer really a leader.</p>
<p>While most of the press is talking about the stunner at Microsoft, the seismic shift may really be occurring at Juniper. <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/its-not-a-microsoft-stupid-its-about-juniper/#more-761" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/its-not-a-microsoft-stupid-its-about-juniper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redmond watch</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/redmond-watch/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/redmond-watch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Darrow</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Microsoft</category>

		<category>News</category>

		<category>Barbara Darrow</category>

		<category>Vendor partner business issues</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/redmond-watch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Redmond Watch is on. How soon can Microsoft erase all signs of Kevin Johnson? His name is already gone from the agenda for today&#8217;s Financial Analyst Meeting where he was supposed to take the stage at 9:10 a.m. Now CEO Steve Ballmer is slated from 8:40 to 9:35.
Insiders think Satya Nadella, king of Microsoft [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Redmond Watch is on. How soon can Microsoft erase all signs of <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/windows-chief-kevin-johnson-exits-microsoft/">Kevin Johnson</a>? His name is already gone from the agenda for today&#8217;s Financial Analyst Meeting where he was supposed to take the stage at 9:10 a.m. Now CEO Steve Ballmer is slated from 8:40 to 9:35.</p>
<p>Insiders think Satya Nadella, king of Microsoft search, will be featured.</p>
<p>Johnson, the former president of Microsoft&#8217;s Platforms and Services Group, is now famously leaving to become CEO of Juniper Networks. Scott Kriens is still technically CEO there, btw, so Juniper&#8217;s got a big PR problem on their hands.</p>
<p> If KJ is a no-show today, as most surmise, does that mean he&#8217;s finished managing the transition Microsoft talked about in its press release? Ummm, smart money is the answer is yes. Meanwhile, like the Kremlin after a purge, traces of KJ are already disappearing.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/24/redmond-watch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows chief Kevin Johnson exits Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/windows-chief-kevin-johnson-exits-microsoft/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/windows-chief-kevin-johnson-exits-microsoft/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Darrow</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Software as a service (SaaS)</category>

		<category>Microsoft</category>

		<category>News</category>

		<category>Barbara Darrow</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/windows-chief-kevin-johnson-exits-microsoft/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.
Kevin Johnson, the Microsoft exec in charge of Windows and the company&#8217;s huge online services push, is leaving to head Juniper Networks, The Wall Street Journal reports Wednesday night.
(Note: Microsoft just posted the official news.)
Johnson was much involved in Microsoft&#8217;s thus-far-abortive attempt to buy Yahoo for its Web search and ad expertise. He was also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="right" src="http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii319/itchannel/kj.jpg" />Wow.</p>
<p>Kevin Johnson, the Microsoft exec in charge of Windows <em>and</em> the company&#8217;s huge online services push, is leaving to head Juniper Networks, <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121685264602278849.html"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a> reports Wednesday night.</p>
<p><em>(Note: Microsoft just </em><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2008/jul08/07-23CorpNewsPR.mspx"><em>posted the official news</em></a><em>.)</em></p>
<p>Johnson was much involved in Microsoft&#8217;s thus-far-abortive attempt to buy Yahoo for its Web search and ad expertise. He was also the point man in Microsoft&#8217;s big buy of aQuantive.  Both acquisitions were aimed at Google&#8217;s dominance.</p>
<p>Oh, and &#8220;KJ&#8221; was also at CEO Steve Ballmer&#8217;s side on the Microsoft campus today for a company &#8220;town hall&#8221; meeting. No mention of his impending exit was made.</p>
<p>The news hit the day before Microsoft&#8217;s annual financial analysts&#8217; meeting in Redmond, Wash.  Johnson was on the agenda. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see who fills that slot.</p>
<p>The paper reports that Johnson&#8217;s group, which includes the company&#8217;s past-and-present Windows warhorse as well as its nascent (and very expensive)  online services push, will be split with Ballmer taking on Windows and associated Windows Live services with Steve Sinofsky, John Devaan, and Bill Veghte reporting to him. The other group will take on search, online advertising and MSN, the <em>Journal</em> reported, citing unnamed sources.</p>
<p>Microsoft earlier this year hired <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/thoughts-on-microsoft-wpc-plus-seven/">Stephen Elop</a> to head its profitable business division out of <a href="http://adtmag.com/article.aspx?id=21821">Juniper Networks</a>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/windows-chief-kevin-johnson-exits-microsoft/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft debuts Windows Vista ad</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/microsoft-debuts-windows-vista-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/microsoft-debuts-windows-vista-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Colin Steele</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Microsoft</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/microsoft-debuts-windows-vista-ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Microsoft ad for Windows Vista began making the online rounds this week:

Reaction to the ad has been negative so far, and Microsoft even reportedly pulled the ad from its site. But if it does give a glimpse into Microsoft&#8217;s pro-Vista campaign, here are some ideas for follow-up ads:
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left">This Microsoft ad for Windows Vista began making the online rounds this week:</p>
<p><img src="http://i267.photobucket.com/albums/ii319/itchannel/vistaad.jpg" alt="Vista ad" /></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://gizmodo.com/5027647/microsofts-vista-doesnt-suck-ad-campaign-thinks-everyone-remembers-the-15th-century">Reaction to the ad</a> has been negative so far, and Microsoft even reportedly <a target="_blank" href="http://www.crn.com/software/209400721;jsessionid=4YZKSOCNCR0UAQSNDLPSKH0CJUNN2JVN">pulled the ad</a> from its site. But if it does give a glimpse into Microsoft&#8217;s <a href="http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid96_gci1320522,00.html">pro-Vista campaign</a>, here are some ideas for follow-up ads:</p>
<p> <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/microsoft-debuts-windows-vista-ad/#more-758" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/23/microsoft-debuts-windows-vista-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brocade-Foundry acquisition takes aim at Cisco, could be good for both channels</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/brocade-foundry-acquisition-takes-aim-at-cisco-could-be-good-for-both-channels/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/brocade-foundry-acquisition-takes-aim-at-cisco-could-be-good-for-both-channels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rlittle</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/brocade-foundry-acquisition-takes-aim-at-cisco-could-be-good-for-both-channels/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brocade will pay nearly $3 billion for Foundry Networks in a move to take on Cisco Systems Inc. in the data center and beyond, the companies announced Monday.
Foundry has a heavy and well-respected arsenal of enterprise networking infrastructure, including routers, switches and more. Brocade said teaming up with Foundry would quickly enable “next generation” technology [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brocade will pay nearly $3 billion for Foundry Networks in a move to take on Cisco Systems Inc. in the data center and beyond, the companies announced Monday.</p>
<p>Foundry has a heavy and well-respected arsenal of enterprise networking infrastructure, including routers, switches and more. Brocade said teaming up with Foundry would quickly enable “next generation” technology development for the data center and provide a full networking portfolio. In fact, the acquisition puts Brocade in a position to offer equipment for wide and local area networks, as well as for data center and storage networks.</p>
<p>Brocade’s storage switches are often connected to Foundry’s data networking switches, so combining the two companies would likely beef up sales channels from both companies, RBC Capital Markets analyst Mark Sue told <em>Reuters</em> Monday. He also said, both companies “share a common foe” in Cisco. <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/brocade-foundry-acquisition-takes-aim-at-cisco-could-be-good-for-both-channels/#more-757" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/brocade-foundry-acquisition-takes-aim-at-cisco-could-be-good-for-both-channels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EDS shareholders move to block HP acquisition</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/eds-shareholders-move-to-block-hp-acquisition/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/eds-shareholders-move-to-block-hp-acquisition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rlittle</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Systems and systems management</category>

		<category>News</category>

		<category>Authors</category>

		<category>Information technology services</category>

		<category>Hewlett-Packard</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/eds-shareholders-move-to-block-hp-acquisition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Electronic Data Systems (EDS) shareholders will take to a Texas district court Thursday to seek an order to postpone a July 31 shareholders meeting in which they are meant to vote on the Hewlett-Packard (HP) acquisition.
Shareholders say the current acquisition agreement stalls the price of EDS shares at $25 and prohibits EDS from seeking higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electronic Data Systems (EDS) shareholders will take to a Texas district court Thursday to seek an order to postpone a July 31 shareholders meeting in which they are meant to vote on the Hewlett-Packard (HP) acquisition.</p>
<p>Shareholders say the current acquisition agreement stalls the price of EDS shares at $25 and prohibits EDS from seeking higher bids from other companies. They say EDS is worth more, considering it has seen increased revenue in the past year and its 2008 revenue projections are on target.</p>
<p>“Why is EDS accepting what many experts consider to be an undervalued share price,&#8221; asked Randall Baron, an attorney with Baron &amp; Budd, one of the law firms representing the shareholders. <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/eds-shareholders-move-to-block-hp-acquisition/#more-756" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/eds-shareholders-move-to-block-hp-acquisition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on Microsoft WPC (plus seven)</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/thoughts-on-microsoft-wpc-plus-seven/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/thoughts-on-microsoft-wpc-plus-seven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Darrow</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Direct reseller channel conflict</category>

		<category>Microsoft</category>

		<category>Cisco</category>

		<category>Channel partner programs</category>

		<category>Barbara Darrow</category>

		<category>IT channel products and technologies</category>

		<category>Vendor partner business issues</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/thoughts-on-microsoft-wpc-plus-seven/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a week since Microsoft&#8217;s Worldwide Partner Conference, and sometimes a couple days of beaching it (along with a little adult beveraging), puts stuff into perspective.
Here&#8217;s what percolated to the top of mind after some R&#38;R:

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a week since <a href="http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/generic/0,295582,sid96_gci1321237,00.html">Microsoft&#8217;s Worldwide Partner Conference</a>, and sometimes a couple days of beaching it (along with a little adult beveraging), puts stuff into perspective.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what percolated to the top of mind after some R&amp;R: <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/thoughts-on-microsoft-wpc-plus-seven/#more-755" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/21/thoughts-on-microsoft-wpc-plus-seven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Fibre Channel over Ethernet really ready for primetime?</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/20/is-fibre-channel-over-ethernet-really-ready-for-primetime/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/20/is-fibre-channel-over-ethernet-really-ready-for-primetime/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rlittle</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Data storage management</category>

		<category>Servers and desktop hardware</category>

		<category>Microsoft</category>

		<category>Networking technology</category>

		<category>Cisco</category>

		<category>Channel partner programs</category>

		<category>Reseller channel business development</category>

		<category>Enterprise applications</category>

		<category>News</category>

		<category>Sun</category>

		<category>Authors</category>

		<category>IT channel products and technologies</category>

		<category>EMC</category>

		<category>Hewlett-Packard</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/20/is-fibre-channel-over-ethernet-really-ready-for-primetime/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask Cisco executives about Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) deployment in data center and storage networks and they’ll tell you it’s a no-brainer. The technology will be ready for volume deployment by next year or 2010, and the channel should gear up and start training now.
Ask Brocade, a major Fibre Channel switch rival, and they’ll [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask Cisco executives about Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) deployment in data center and storage networks and they’ll tell you it’s a no-brainer. The technology will be ready for volume deployment by next year or 2010, and the channel should gear up and start training now.</p>
<p><a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid5_gci1319006,00.html">Ask Brocade, a major Fibre Channel switch rival</a>, and they’ll tell you to hold your horses &#8212; the enterprise is not ready to re-jigger entire data centers and the technology won’t take off until 2012. In fact, Brocade spent its Technology Day at the end of June warning that it would take its time with FCoE, not even doing customer testing until 2009. Brocade also said it would continue developing straight Fibre Channel equipment since that would be the dominant protocol for enterprise storage until at least 2014 . <a href="http://searchstorage.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid5_gci1320272,00.html">Cisco was happy to quickly counter Brocade in the press</a>. <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/20/is-fibre-channel-over-ethernet-really-ready-for-primetime/#more-754" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/20/is-fibre-channel-over-ethernet-really-ready-for-primetime/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP’s mini-data center in a box: No partner play yet</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/hp%e2%80%99s-mini-data-center-in-a-box-no-partner-play-yet/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/hp%e2%80%99s-mini-data-center-in-a-box-no-partner-play-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rlittle</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Data storage management</category>

		<category>Servers and desktop hardware</category>

		<category>Direct reseller channel conflict</category>

		<category>Software as a service (SaaS)</category>

		<category>Networking technology</category>

		<category>Server virtualization</category>

		<category>Channel partner programs</category>

		<category>Reseller channel business development</category>

		<category>IBM</category>

		<category>News</category>

		<category>Sun</category>

		<category>Authors</category>

		<category>IT channel products and technologies</category>

		<category>Hewlett-Packard</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/hp%e2%80%99s-mini-data-center-in-a-box-no-partner-play-yet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HP has introduced a data center in a box. Or a pod. Well actually a shipping container.
The mini data center, called Performance Optimized Data Center or POD, is a 40-foot shipping container that houses more than 3,500 computer nodes, or 12,000 large-hard drives, and delivers the equivalent of more than 4,000 square feet of typical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HP has introduced a data center in a box. Or a pod. Well actually a shipping container.</p>
<p>The mini data center, called Performance Optimized Data Center or POD, is a 40-foot shipping container that houses more than 3,500 computer nodes, or 12,000 large-hard drives, and delivers the equivalent of more than 4,000 square feet of typical data center capacity.</p>
<p>But partners need to keep an eye on HP as it rolls out this package. Initially there will be no channel partner play, though the company promises that eventually there will be. The data centers in a box &#8212; which are custom built according to user needs and ship in about six weeks from the time of order &#8212; are expected to be out in the U.S. in October and will be available worldwide shortly after.</p>
<p> <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/hp%e2%80%99s-mini-data-center-in-a-box-no-partner-play-yet/#more-752" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/hp%e2%80%99s-mini-data-center-in-a-box-no-partner-play-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Belden-Trapeze deal complete</title>
		<link>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/belden-trapeze-deal-complete/</link>
		<comments>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/belden-trapeze-deal-complete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rlittle</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Uncategorized</category>

		<category>Networking technology</category>

		<category>Cisco</category>

		<category>Wireless networking</category>

		<category>Channel partner programs</category>

		<category>Reseller channel business development</category>

		<category>Mobile networking technology</category>

		<category>News</category>

		<category>Authors</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/belden-trapeze-deal-complete/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Belden Cable announced this week that its $133 million acquisition of one of the largest privately owned Wireless LAN (WLAN) providers Trapeze Networks is complete.
Published statements from Belden still don’t make clear how, or even if, Trapeze’s 200 partners will be worked into Belden’s much larger channel. In fact, a published quote from Trapeze president [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belden Cable announced this week that its $133 million acquisition of one of the largest privately owned Wireless LAN (WLAN) providers Trapeze Networks is complete.</p>
<p>Published statements from Belden still don’t make clear how, or even if, Trapeze’s 200 partners will be worked into Belden’s much larger channel. In fact, a published quote from Trapeze president Jim Vogt avoids any mention of the company’s channel, but does laud Belden’s sales and marketing organization. <a href="http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/belden-trapeze-deal-complete/#more-751" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://channelmarker.blogs.techtarget.com/2008/07/17/belden-trapeze-deal-complete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
